Is the United States currently the most heavily and effectively propagandized country on the face of the earth?
How would one measure such a thing?
Where in the world is The New York Times on the subject of the crime of the century, the mass murder of September 11, 2001, much of which took place in the newspaper’s front yard and the U.S. government’s explanations for which don’t begin to hold water yet go unchallenged by the Times?
Who calls the shots over there?
Can a nation be accurately deemed a democratic republic if it is so ill served by mainstream media utterly out to lunch on key events and practices?
Are the mainstream media of this country putting themselves out of business for sheer lack of credibility?
Why should Bruce Henry and I, two reasonably intelligent retirees who bother to pay attention, have found ourselves walking across Massachusetts from Provincetown to the New York State line this spring to raise awareness about the need for a real investigation into all aspects of the September 11, 2001, crimes, before, during and after that date?
Why do, almost without exception, educated and accomplished members of polite society demur to the point of muteness when given copies of the excellent booklet “Beyond Misinformation: What Science Says About the Destruction of World Trade Center Buildings 1, 2, and 7” put out by Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth?
What do the questions above have to do with the mainstream media’s self-muzzling in the face of revelations concerning the murder of President Kennedy in 1963 and the murders of Martin Luther KIng Jr. and Sen. Robert Kennedy less than five years later?
Why does the United States place 45th in the current ranking of the World Press Freedom Index of Reporters Without Borders?
How much did the current president’s 2016 election have to do with his campaign’s striking a chord with an electorate in agreement with his assessment of the news media’s credibility?
What popular-culture offerings of this and the last century can help shed light on these interrelated questions?
Can aroused and awakened citizens rise to the task, or has “mum’s the word” become the national motto in the “land of the brave and the home of the free”?
What happened to the child in “The Emperor’s New Clothes” who shouted what he saw as the naked monarch walked asininely by in a parade?
More than three months have passed since two of us took to the Commonwealth’s highways with our four “9/11 TRUTH” signs — to hearteningly positive response. This website is an extention of the walk. It’s one of dozens deemed unnewsworthy in by the managers of corrupt and compromised news media seemingly dedicated to coverup.
In the coming weeks we will try to give useful context and answers.
— Mark