‘Just One More Thing’ *

A possibly key development in 2018 that we omitted yesterday was the U.S. Senate resolution unanimously calling for declassification of all “documents related to the events of September 11, 2001,” to be declassified and stating that “the survivors, the families, and the people of the United States deserve answers about the events and circumstances surrounding the terrorist attacks upon the United States.” Please find our post about it HERE.

It’s worth noting that the senator who sponsored the resolution, Richard Blumenthal, was United States Attorney for the District of Connecticut from 1977 to 1981 and may be able to communicate effectively with U.S. Attorney Geoffrey S. Berman of the District of Southern New York. (Our post yesterday notes Berman’s response to the Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry petitions for a Special Grand Jury to consider evidence of as-yet unprosecuted federal crimes related to the World Trade Center building collapses.)

Like the three events in 2018 we mentioned yesterday, it was not covered by The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Associated Press, or other organs of the mainstream media. Which is why we didn’t find out about it until more than three weeks after the unanimous vote.

— Mark

* As Lt. Columbo might say.

A Bit of 2018

In 2018 we walked across Massachusetts from Provincetown at the eastern tip of Cape Cod to the New York State border with “9/11 Truth” signs on our chests and backpacks, after talking about doing something like it for more than a year.

This blog has provided occasional glimpses of the walk from mid-April to mid-May and, later, of events in the 9/11 Truth movement or related subjects. It will continue.

Among the year’s events related to the historic mass murders and destruction of Sept. 11, 2001:

* Publication in September of 9/11 Unmasked: An International Review Panel Investigation, by David Ray Griffin and Elizabeth Woodworth. It’s roughly the tenth book Olive Branch Press has published by Griffin, the first co-authored by his longtime collaborator.

* Official action in November by the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York to empanel a Special Grand Jury to consider evidence contradicting the official government account of the destruction of three World Trade Center skyscrapers, and act on it. U.S. Attorney Geoffrey S. Berman was responding to petitions filed in April and July by the Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry on behalf of more than a dozen surviving family members of victims of the Sept. 11, 2001, terror.

* The off-Broadway debut in June of “A Blanket of Dust,” at The Flea in lower Manhattan, which we drove in to see after missing our train by minutes. After the performance we attended media critic Mark Crispin Miller’s interview on stage with playwright Richard Squires and architect Bill Brinnier. Brinnier’s best friend, Frank DeMartini, the WTC construction manager, died in the collapse of the North Tower while rescuing dozens of people trapped in its upper floors.

We hope this powerful drama will be performed “on the road,” possibly starting in 2019. Its title reminds one that the two WTC towers and Building 7 were not destroyed by the impact of two jetliners and office fires touched off by their fuel, but rather were mystifyingly pulverized, coating a large area with several inches of fine dust.

What there was not in 2018 was any significant lessening of the surreal mainstream media neglect of anything challenging the official, impossible “9/11” narrative — in disappointing contrast to their publishing valuable work by dozens of their own reporters in the first few years after the murder and mayhem of Sept. 11, 2001.

With thanks to everyone who provided physical or morale-boosting help or inspiration . . .

— Bruce Riblet Henry and Mark Channing Miller

Letter

A letter to the editor in this morning’s Berkshire Eagle,* headed “Learning leads to truth in ignorant times,” reads as follows:

“Look to knowledge for truth, seeking ever for righteousness, unlike some who wallow in deliberate ignorance and stumble into twittering lies.

“I would hope that my children and many others would look to and promote learning as the true path revealing truth, rather than be absorbed by floods of propagandistic tweets in ignorant repetitiveness!

“Open our minds, Lord, that we may see and hear your designed laws of science that correctly lead toward peace and comfort for all, and a seasonal prayer of obedience and faith.”

[signed] Fritz Doerring, [town of] Adams

— Mark

* The daily newspaper in Pittsfield, Massachusetts, second-to-last town on a walk Bruce and I took last spring from Provincetown to the New York State line at Hancock to call attention to the need for a real investigation into the mass murders and destruction of Sept. 11, 2001.

Ho ho ho !

Want to know how the Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry and Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth have been doing in their joint effort to raise $50,000 by Dec. 31, 2018? Click HERE to find out, or to chip in.

The two groups have united in the drive for a Special Grand Jury investigation of as-yet-unprosecuted federal crimes in the destruction and mass murders of Sept. 11, 2001, at the World Trade Center.

Meanwhile, to find out why The New York Times or The Washington Post or The Associated Press aren’t on top of this (and a lot of other matters), click HERE for Caitlin Johnstone’s explanation and HERE for Christopher Hedges’*.

The short answer is, they’re not free to be.

And scroll down for info about the Lawyers’ Committee and the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York’s response to the Committee’s two petitions for a Special Grand Jury investigation.

Merry Christmas!

— Bruce and Mark

* Hedges mentions but does not link to Seymour Hersh’s report several years ago in The London Review of Books entitled “The Killing of Osama bin Laden.” Find it HERE.

Support the Investigation!

In connection with the post just below this one, here’s a link, HERE, to “help the Lawyers’ Committee and AE911Truth raise $50,000 by Dec. 31 to continue our legal advocacy in 2019.”

Curious? Of course, there’s a “Donate Now” button. But besides learning how many donations have been made and how much has been raised, you can find other specific info.

It includes measures in five categories the Lawyers’ Committee will take to further the Special Grand Jury investigation. They are (1) U.S. Attorney Advocacy, (2) Persons with Material Information, (3) Freedom of Information Act Requests, (4) Expert and Witness Declarations, and (5) Mandamus Action.

In addition to brief descriptions of these measures, there are the texts of (1) the Lawyers’ Committee’s original petition to the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, filed on April 10, 2018, (2) their amended petition, filed on July 30, and (3) the U.S. Attorney’s letter of reply, dated Nov. 7.

When you get a minute, look it all over. Then please help out by clicking on “Donate Now” and kicking in a few bucks yourself.

Thank you.

— Bruce and Mark

Watch . . .

In the darkest days of December, hopeful news:

Breakthroughs coming to light in the last month are some of the most favorable since questioners started challenging impossible official stories about the murderous terror of September 11, 2001, in which nearly 3,000 people in the United States were killed in a single morning.

Please set aside an hour and a quarter to watch this INTERVIEW conducted a week ago. Jason Goodman of Crowdsource the Truth talks with RICHARD GAGE of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth and MICK HARRISON, DAVID MEISWINKLE and BARBARA HONEGGER of the Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry.

It’s a nice summary of what has happened since the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York said his office would comply with federal law in response to the Lawyers’ Committee’s two petitions to send voluminous evidence they have gathered to a Special Grand Jury to investigate yet-to-be-prosecuted federal crimes related to the destruction of three World Trade Center towers.

— Mark

 

 

Question

How stupid do the people* who put together the government/mainstream media narrative about the mass murders of Sept. 11, 2001, think people** are?

How. Stupid. ?

— Mark

*There have to be considerable numbers of them in government, business, and throughout the media.

**Everybody else, those not involved in constructing and supporting that impossible fairy tale.

Busy U.S. Attorney

It’s rare to see a news story related to investigating any of the mass murders of Sept. 11, 2001. Yet two greeted readers of The Berkshire Eagle* on its front page this morning, even if those massacres and their proper investigation were not mentioned.

The Washington Post and Associated Press stories, under the Eagle’s headlines “US attorney implicates Trump, campaign” and “Trump’s AG pick will face scrutiny,” may be found here and here as they appeared in other newspapers online.

Both relate to having a federal Special Grand Jury investigate the destruction of three World Trade Center skyscrapers more than 17 years ago.

The U.S. Attorney in the first story, Geoffrey S. Berman, in the Southern District of New York, is the same one who last month responded, tersely, to petitions on behalf of 12 families of individuals killed in the WTC building collapses, saying that his office would abide by federal law and referstacks of evidence about the collapses to a federal Special Grand Jury (even if he didn’t say it in so many words).

Please scroll down for an earlier mention in this blog of the U.S. Attorney’s response to the petitions filed by the Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry. The entry is titled “A Special Grand Jury to Get 9/11 Evidence.”

The second story is about President Trump’s nomination Friday of former U.S. Attorney General William Barr to “once again serve as America’s top law enforcement official.” It relates to a possible federal Special Grand Jury investigation because Barr, if approved for the post, would head the U.S. Department of Justice and be Berman’s boss.

— Mark

* Daily newspaper published in Pittsfield, Massachusetts, second-to-last town Bruce Henry and I walked through on our way from Provincetown on Cape Cod last spring wearing “9/11 Truth” signs to call attention to the need for a real investigation.

The Gap

For everyone who feels that mainstream media outlets are lying more and more these days — through commission (outright falsehoods), omission (important things deliberately and consistently left out), and spin (sliding around or away from what’s going on)  — this, here, is for you.

— Mark

A Special Grand Jury to Get 9/11 Evidence

The United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York will submit to a Special Grand Jury evidence supplied by the Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry concerning the destruction of three World Trade Center skyscrapers on September 11, 2001, according to a Lawyers’ Committee press release issued yesterday.

The U.S. Attorney’s Office said in a letter dated Nov. 7 that it would present to a Special Grand Jury evidence that the Lawyers’ Committee had provided to the office in two petitions in April and July.

Click here for the full press release. It contains links to at least one of the petitions, 57 petition exhibits, and related information supporting the Lawyers’ Committee work.

The release also includes a copy of the letter the Lawyers’ Committee received signed by Michael Farrara, one of two chiefs of the office’s Terrorism and International Narcotics unit on behalf of the unit and of United States Attorney Geoffrey S. Berman, who heads the office, addressed to Attorney Mick G. Harrison, Lawyers’ Committee’s litigation director. The brief letter reads in part as follows:

“We have received and reviewed The Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry, Inc.’s submissions of April 10 and July 30, 2018. We will comply with the provisions of 18 U.S.C. § 3332 [United States Code Title 18, Section 3332] as they relate to your submissions.”

The release says the Lawyers’ Committee had supplied the U.S. District Attorney’s Office with “extensive evidence of so-far unprosecuted federal crimes relating to the destruction of three World Trade Center Towers on 9/11 (WTC1, WRC2 and WTC7).”

It says the Lawyers’ Committee had noted that “the U.S. Attorney is legally required to present this evidence of 9/11 related federal crimes to a Special Grand Jury pursuant to a federal statute, 18 U.S.C. § 3332.”

— Mark