A bit of remote coverage of the conference on the first of four days of events focusing on the mass murders of Sept. 11, 2001 — at the World Trade Center in New York City, at the Pentagon headquarters outside Washington, D.C., and in a field in Pennsylvania — and related matters. (9/11 TRUTH 9-9-25 is HERE, or scroll down.  GAZA and UKRAINE entries for this date are HERE and HERE.) — MCM

–   –   –

Turning the Tide: 9/11 Justice in 2025 — Day 1

The three-day live-streamed conference in Washington, D.C., called “Turning the Tide: 9/11 Justice in 2025,” and described HERE, began today at 5 p.m in Washington, D.C., with an introduction by Mathava Setty, M.D., and a presentation by Richard Gage, a founder of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth.

To access the event for free, go to the website of the International Center for 9/11 Justice and click on Redacted there.

(Unfortunately for viewers watching live online, the photos and other graphics were part of Gage’s presentation were apparently visible only to those in the room at Washington Quaker Meeting. So at about 6:40 p.m. Eastern time Mathava announced a 15-minute break for techies there to try to resolve the problem.)

U.S. Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wisc., began speaking at around 6:45 p.m., describing his evolving experience in the world of “9/11 truth,” offering some advice to newcomers, and answering questions and considering comments from audience members.

Then, Danish chemistry professor Niels Harriet followed with an illustrated explanation of the intricacies of thermite, thermate, and the nanotechnology he sees as evident in the destruction of the Twin Towers at WTC on Sept. 11, 2001. (Some of the production difficulties had been successfully addressed.)

After a 15-minute break that began around 7:38, IC911 executive director Ted Walter spoke, with plenty of video and other graphic supports,  gave a presentation titled “Toward Incontrovertible Seismic Evidence of Pre-Impact Explosions,” one that is so technical and complex that it is bound to lose most of his audience. It questions the accounts given by the National Institute of Science and Technology (NIST) team on seismic evidence concerning destruction of the WTC Towers.