News, 10-19-21

Colin Powell (1937 – 2021)

Colin Powell died yesterday. The former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Statf better known as the U.S. Secretary of State who gave credence in a 2003 United Nations address to false claims that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction, leading to the second major war resulting from the September 2001 attacks designed to terrorize the United States and the world, was 84. An Associated Press obituary by Robert Burns, Eric Tucker and Eileen Putman, headlined “Colin Powell dies, trailblazing general was stained by Iraq,” is HERE.

Powell was the first black chairman of the Joint Chiefs and the first black U.S. Secretary of State, serving in those positions during the administrations of presidents George H.W. Bush and George W. Bush, respectively.

–   –   –

Betsy Dovydenas to Speak on Deception by Cult Leader

“LENOX — Painter and author Betsy Dovydenas will discuss her just-published book, ‘In Case You Want to Know How I Got Brainwashed,’ this Saturday at Shakespeare & Company’s New Spruce Theatre,” begins a story in today’s Berkshire Eagle under the headline “Author to describe subjugation by a cult leader.” The entire Eagle account is HERE for subscribers.

In the mid-1980s, under the influence of the Rev. Carl Stevens Jr., Dovydenas donated $6.5 million to The Bible Speaks. A federal bankruptcy judge ordered the pastor to repay her the entire sum, but the award was reduced on appeal to $5.5 million. The Shakespeare & Company theater festival now occupies the former Bible Speaks campus, which was once that of a boys’ boarding school.

A Wikipedia entry of the legal case “In re The Bible Speaks,” is HERE. An amazon.com description of the book, If You Want to Know How I Got Brainwashed: Story and Paintings, is HERE.

“In more than 200 monoprints with narrative text, she tells the story of being tricked, sweet-talked, coaxed, manipulated, conned, coerced and exploited,” the Amazon text reads in part. “In short, she was brainwashed.”

— Mark Channing Miller

Weekender, 10-17-21

This Weekender is longer than usual, begun after a walk. Several items I’d meant to include will have to wait until tomorrow or Tuesday. — MCM

Brain Shutdown: The banner headline high on page 1 of the Sunday Republican newsprint editions reads

‘It’s like their brain shuts down’

The story out of Worcester by masslive reporter Michael Bonner is not about how millions of Americans (although probably no longer a majority) still accept the Executive Branch accounts of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks designed to terrorize the American people — even though those accounts are completely unsupportable scientifically — because mountains of relevant evidence is being suppressed  by the Executive Branch, and the mainstream media is apparently OK with it.

No, the story is Covid-related, as are many of the top stories in newspapers and on radio and TV every day throughout the country. Covid, Covid, Covid. The subhead: “Researchers study how COVID causes some to experience dementia-like symptoms.” (Even for subscribers, that story was not on the masslive website by 11:15 this morning. The story that topped the list is headed ”COVID vaccine mandates: Massachusetts hospitals see upwards of 90% of caregivers immunized as threats of job loss loom.”

–   –   –

How ’Bout Them Sox!: The big teaser headline in white against a blue background in the Republican today is

‘A GRAND WIN FOR SOX’

The subhead is “The Red Sox had 2 grand slams last night for a 9-5 win over the Astros in Houston, tying the series at 1-1, Page B1. The headline and subhead over the story there by Kristie Ripken is “Grand win ties series: Martinez, Denver’s drive in 8 runs for Boston.”

In other news . . .

–   –   –

Russ Kick Is Gone . . . Who?: The relatively unknown Russ Kick died on Sept. 12 at his home in Tucson, Arizona. Below are links to bylines and headlines of obituaries in the Washington Post and the New York Times, published on Sept. 24 and Oct. 15, respectively.

By Harrison Smith, “Russ Kick, writer, editor and ‘rogue transparency activist,’ dies at 52.”

By Katharine Q. Seelye, “Russ Kick, 52, Author and Star in the World of Activist Researchers.”

For a brief autobiographical sketch of Kirk from one of his websites, http://russkick.com,  click HERE. The Wikipedia entry for him is HERE. For a brief obituary and some tributes at http://insideeko.com, click HERE.

–   –   –

Former Columnist, Future Governor?: Nicholas Kristoff, who took a leave of absence from the New York Times last June, is exploring a candidacy for governor of his home state, Oregon. The story as reported by Marc Tracy is headed “Times Veteran Leaves to Ponder Political Run. Kristoff, 62, was employed by the newspaper for 37 years as a reporter, editor and columnist. A Fox News report quoted him, HERE, as saying, “I’ve reluctantly concluded that I should try not only to expose problems but also see if I can fix them directly.” The Seattle Times used THIS STORY from the Washington Post by Felicia Sonmez and Amy B. Wang.

–   –   –

Two by Whitehead: John W. Whitehead of the Rutherford Institute is not pleased with everything either, or at least he wasn’t when he wrote two essays in 2019 and 2020. Find them HERE and HERE.

— Mark Channing Miller

A Recommendation

The following is reprinted with permission from the new book Unanswered Questions: What the September Eleventh Families Asked and the 9/11 Commission Ignored, by Ray McGinnis. It appears as the book’s Forward, on pages v through viii, just before the author’s Introduction. — MCM

FORWARD

By John B. Cobb, Jr.

September Eleventh, for many people, is history. But not so for those who lost loved ones on that fateful day. Each September Eleventh, 9/11 family members stand at podiums and read the names of loved ones who died in the attacks. Yet few of us are aware that 9/11 families pressed for an independent investigations into the attacks against the objections of the Bush White House. Few are aware 9/11 families presented hundreds of questions to the 9/11 Commission to aid the investigation.

Like many people recovering from tragedy, they want closure. That closure would require at least a credible account of what happened. Sadly, their questions have largely not been answered. With all its resources for research and investigation, the American government designated $3 million, and eventually spent only $14 million, to, as President Bush stated, “uncover every detail and learn every lesson of September the Eleventh.” In comparison, over $80 million was spent in the 1990s investigating Bill and Hillary Clinton regarding the death of deputy White House counsel Vincent Foster, the Whitewater scandal, and the Bill Clinton-Monica Lewinsky sex scandal. Principally, the 9/11 Commission blamed the attacks on “a failure of imagination.” Either the government does not know much about what happened, or it declines to tell.

Some people will object to this characterization, saying that the government has provided an account: The 9/11 Commission Report. Granted. But it contains so many inconsistencies and is often so vague that those with serious questions remain frustrated and upset. Indeed, what they are told only raises new questions. Too often, 9/11 families are told that the information they seek is classified, even when it is hard to believe that there are good reasons for withholding it.

Ray McGinnis has written a book that takes the concerns of those whose loved ones died in that awful atrocity with utmost seriousness. He does what he can, starting with some of the questions the 9/11 families asked the Commission to investigate, and searches for answers. Since the 9/11 families are not the only people who are curious about these matters, the answers he offers in this book are of much broader interest.

Obviously, there are many questions that he cannot answer, but what is surprising is how much reliable information he has found. The government and the press have not done a good job of keeping the mourners informed—or the general public. Simply to learn what can be known may help toward at least a partial closure.

For others, the primary focus of concern is less a matter of closure and more to prevent a repeat. No one can question that our vaunted security system failed utterly to protect us on that infamous day. Surprisingly, none of those who were actors in this debacle have been reprimanded. They have kept their jobs, and even been promoted. Why is this? Does it mean that human beings had no responsibility for the failure? Does the fault lie entirely in the system?

In that case, all the more, we citizens need to be assured that the system has been radically improved. All of us want this assurance. But when we inquire, we are told that nothing is to be gained by blaming people.

Citizen inquiry into the government’s account is characterized as speculation, even as our government instructs us: “If you see something, say something.” Or we are confronted with silence, sometimes justified as the protection of secrets.

Perhaps the many branches of government involved in this failure have engaged in a thorough self-examination and have adjusted their practices and policies to ensure that they will not fail again. Perhaps the failure of interdepartmental communications has also been fully examined. But if so, we need more than casual assurance that we have no need to worry. We received that verbal assurance before the 9/11 event.

If they would tell us where the system broke down, we would be assured that they knew what to fix. Surely, they could tell us a bit about this without risking the nation’s security. Vague assurances of the kind we have received—basically just asking us to trust them—provide no closure for those who most deeply care.

The live proceedings of the Watergate conspiracy and the Iran-Contra Affair were broadcast daily, In contrast, the 9/11 Commission proceedings only received mainstream coverage with the appearances of Richard A. Clarke and Condoleezza Rice. Otherwise, the proceedings of the 9/11 Commission were mostly a footenote buried beneath the headlines.

After the 9/11 Commission concluded, the chairman, Thomas Kean, and vice chairman, Lee Hamilton, said it was “set up to fail.” The Los Angeles Times called Kean and Hamilton’s book, Without Precedent, “a devastating account of how the Bush administration blocked the 9/11 Commission at virtually every step.”

McGinnis’ book is inherently critical of our government. He agrees that the needs of whose whose questions he is writing about have not been taken seriously. He tells the story of their repeated frustrations and disappointments

Speaking simply for myself, I say that people who go to great lengths to keep others ignorant appear to have something to hide. I feel certain that those who have experienced refusal to real information for so long must sometimes share this suspicion.

But McGinnis notes that the questioners are a varied group. There is no consensus among them. He leaves the question of why things have happened as they have for readers to decide for themselves. He just tells us what happened.

May that information bring some closure to those who need it! In any case, all who read Unanswered Questions: What the September Eleventh Families Asked and the 9/11 Commission Ignored will be reliably and richly informed. As a bonus they will find it quite wonderfully readable.

–   –   –

John B. Cobb, Jr. is an American theologian, philosopher, and environmentalist who has authored more than 50 books. Three months after the release of The 9/11 Commission Report in July 2004, he was one of 147 original signers of a petition asking for a deeper investigation into the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.The October 2004 statement, along with the names of the signers, is HERE.

Hannah Speaks

Below are 25 quotes from the writings and talks of the German-American political philosopher Hannah Arendt (1906-1975), whose birthday is tomorrow, Oct. 14. I decided to take a break from reading the remarkable new book Unanswered Questions: What the September Eleventh Families Asked and the 9/11 Commission Ignored, by Ray McGinnis, to add them to the blog because they’re particularly appropriate in this day and age. — MCM)

–   –   –

The ideal subject of totalitarian rule is not the convinced Nazi or the dedicated communist, but people for whom the distinction between fact and fiction, true and false, no longer exists.

–   –   –

I’m more than ever of the opinion that a decent human existence is possible today only on the fringes of society, where one then runs the risk of starving or being stoned to death. In these circumstances, a sense of humor is a great help.

–   –   –

The result of a consistent and total substitution of lies for factual truth is not that the lie will now be accepted as truth, and truth be defamed as lie, but that the sense by which we take our bearings in the real world – and the category of truth versus falsehood is among the mental means to this end – is being destroyed.

–   –   –

Evil thrives on apathy and cannot exist without it.

–   –   –

Politically, the weakness of the argument has always been that those who choose the lesser evil forget very quickly that they chose evil.

–   –   –

The sad truth is that most evil is done by people who never make up their minds to be good or evil.

–   –   –

When evil is allowed to compete with good, evil has an emotional populist appeal that wins out unless good men and women stand as a vanguard against abuse.

–   –   –

Politically speaking, tribal nationalism [patriotism] always insists that its own people are surrounded by ‘a world of enemies’ – ‘one against all’ – and that a fundamental difference exists between this people and all others. It claims its people to be unique, individual, incompatible with all others, and denies theoretically the very possibility of a common mankind long before it is used to destroy the humanity of man.

–   –   –

We are free to change the world and start something new in it.

–   –   –

The aim of totalitarian education has never been to instill convictions but to destroy the capacity to form any.

–   –   –

This is the precept by which I have lived: Prepare for the worst; expect the best; and take what comes.

–   –   –

The greatest enemy of authority, therefore, is contempt, and the surest way to undermine it is laughter.

–   –   –

This inability to think created the possibility for many ordinary men to commit evil deeds on a gigantic scale, the like of which had never been seen before. The manifestation of the wind of thought is not knowledge but the ability to tell right from wrong, beautiful from ugly. And I hope that thinking gives people the strength to prevent catastrophes in these rare moments when the chips are down.

–   –   –

One of the greatest advantages of the totalitarian elites of the twenties and thirties was to turn any statement of fact into a question of motive.

–   –   –

There is a strange interdependence between thoughtlessness and evil.

–   –   –

The chief qualification of a mass leader has become unending infallibility; he can never admit an error.

–   –   –

Only the mob and the elite can be attracted by the momentum of totalitarianism itself. The masses have to be won by propaganda.

–   –   –

To think and to be fully alive are the same.

–   –   –

Political questions are far too serious to be left to the politicians.

–   –   –

Truthfulness has never been counted among the political virtues, and lies have always been regarded as justifiable tools in political dealings.

–   –   –

One must think with the body and the soul or not think at all.

–   –   –

I’m more than ever of the opinion that a decent human existence is possible today only on the fringes of society, where one then runs the risk of starving or being stoned to death. In these circumstances, a sense of humor is a great help.

–   –   –

The trouble with Eichmann was precisely that so many were like him, and that the many were neither perverted nor sadistic, that they were, and still are, terribly and terrifyingly normal. From the viewpoint of our legal institutions and of our moral standards of judgment, this normality was much more terrifying than all the atrocities put together.

–   –   –

I’m completely against [feminism]. I have no desire to give up my privileges.

–   –   –

Violence is an expression of impotence.

Hogwash

The official U.S. government Executive Branch story about the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks designed to terrorize the American people and those in other lands was referred to as hogwash (HERE) elsewhere in this blog. Hogwash is defined in Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary, 11th Edition, as follows. — MCM

hog.wash \-,hog-wosh, -,wash \ n (15c)   1 : SWILL  2A, SLOP  2 : NONSENSE, BALDERDASH

From Bangor

As the 20th anniversary of the September 2001 terrorist attacks approached last month, newspapers throughout the United States began publishing their own related stories. Among them are three from the Bangor Daily News in Maine. Click on their headlines below to read. — MCM

“For firefighters in Maine, 9/11 was a ‘turning point’ in their field,” by Emily Burnham.

“20 years later, Mainers remember how the terror attacks hit home,” by  Abigail Curtis.

“A look back at the indelible images of 9/11 on the BDN’s front pages,” by Abigail Curtis.

 

Weekender, 10-9-21

Two Journalists to Share 2021 Nobel Peace Prize

“In an era of increasing authoritarianism and swirling misinformation,” the New York Times began its account of yesterday’s Nobel Peace Prize announcement, “Maria Ressa and Dmitri A. Muratov, who lead independent news outlets in the Philippines and Russia, were honored for their work to hold leaders to account.”

The coverage by Shashank Bengali and  Marc Santora continues HERE. Coverage in this blog yesterday is HERE.

–   –   –

Countries Ranked According to Press Freedoms: Some context for Friday’s announcement from Oslo is provided in the World Press Freedom Index, compiled annually by Reporters Without Borders. Click HERE for it.

–   –   –

How does the United States stack up internationally in press freedoms? One way to measure is to look at where this country ranks among member nations of the European Union and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization.

According to Reporters Without Borders (also known by its French name Reporters sans frontières), the United States currently ranks 12th among the original 12 member nations of NATO in press freedoms, and 20th among the 30 current NATO members.

The United States would rank between Slovenia (36) and Croatia (56) among European Union members in press freedoms.

Here are the names of the original NATO members, with their global World Press Freedom Index rankings in parenthesis: Norway (1), Denmark (4), the Netherlands (6), Portugal (9), Belgium (11), Canada (14), Iceland (16), Luxembourg (20), United Kingdom (33), France (34), Italy (41), United States (44).

Here is the complete list of current NATO member nations with the 2021 global ranking of each: Norway (1), Denmark (4), the Netherlands (6), Portugal (9), Belgium (11), Germany (13), Canada (14), Estonia (15), Iceland (16), Luxembourg (20), Latvia (22), Lithuania (28), Spain (29), United Kingdom (33), France (34), Slovakia (35), Slovenia (36), Czech Republic (40), Italy (41), United States (44), Romania (48), Croatia (56), Poland (64), Greece (70), Albania (83), North Macedonia (90), Hungary (92), Montenegro (104), Bulgaria (112), Turkey (153).

There are currently 27 member states in the European Union. Their 2021 press freedoms rankings are as follows: Finland (2), Sweden (3), Denmark (4), Netherlands (6), Portugal (9), Belgium (11), Ireland (12), Germany (13), Estonia (15), Austria (17), Luxembourg (20), Latvia (22), Cyprus (26), Lithuania (28), Spain (29), Italy (41), France (34), Czechia (40), Romania (48), Slovakia (35), Slovenia (36), Croatia (56), Poland (64), Greece (70), Malta (81), Hungary (94), Bulgaria (112).

Reporters Without Borders is an international non-profit and non-governmental organization. It describes its advocacy as founded on the belief that everyone requires access to the news and information, in line with Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, according to which “Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.”

— Mark Channing Miller

Rays Dominate Sox

That’s reality, in three words, all caps in white on a blue background, near the top of page 1 in today’s Springfield Republican.

RAYS DOMINATE SOX

Subhead: “Red Sox starter Eduardo Rodriguez recorded just 5 outs in Boston’s 5-0 loss to the Tampa Bay Rays in Game 1 of the ALDS. B1.”

B1 refers to page B1,* first page of the Republican’s sports section, where  sports writer Christopher Smith’s story, HERE, is headlined “Sox stumble: Offense struggles against Tampa Bay rookie.”

For an Associated Press story in a Chicago newspaper, click HERE.

More about Rays tomorrow.

Elsewhere in the news . . .

–   –   –

Pope Francis Speaks: “Less Hypocrisy, More Transparency,” Pope Francis said in Italian yesterday.

The pope was saluting Angela Merkel during her final visit to Italy as Germany’s chancellor during which the two reportedly spoke about the approaching United Nations climate talks and sexual abuse by clergy of children.

At the Colosseum, where Merkel also spoke, he expressed a wish for a world of “fewer arms and more food, less hypocrisy and more transparency, more vaccines distributed fairly and fewer weapons marketed indiscriminately.” (Click HERE for an Agence France-Presse story in the Straits Times.)

In his address the Pope was not talking about international mainstream media skittishness, or organized religion’s, in dealing with the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, designed to terrorize the American people, assisted days later by the Anthrax attacks; he knows full well, like the Most Rev. Michael Curry of the Episcopal Church in the United States — that the official U.S. government Executive Branch story about the September 2001 attacks is hogwash. (Find mentions of Presiding Bishop Curry’s Sept. 12 sermon HERE and HERE.)

In other news . . .

–   –   –

Journalists Awarded 2021 Nobel Peace Prize: NPR’s “Morning Edition” reported today, HERE, that Maria Ressa of the Philippines and Dmitri Muratov of Russia will share this year’s Nobel Prize for Peace. (An AP account is HERE.)

Freedom of expression is “a prerequisite for democracy and lasting peace,” the Norwegian Nobel Committee said in a statement.

Ressa is co-founder and CEO of the Philippines-based news website Rappler, which has focused “critical attention on the [Filipino President Rodrigo] Duterte regime’s controversial, murderous anti-drug campaign,” the Nobel committee said.

Muratov is editor-in-chief of Novaya Gazeta, Russia’s main opposition newspaper. “Novaya gazeta is the most independent newspaper in Russia today, with a fundamentally critical attitude towards power,” the Nobel committee said. “The newspaper’s fact-based journalism and professional integrity have made it an important source of information on censurable aspects of Russian society rarely mentioned by other media.”

The Philippines and Russia rank 138 and 150 in the 2021 World Press Freedom Index. The United States ranks 44th. Overall rankings and details are HERE.

This year’s top ten, in order, are Norway, Finland, Sweden, Denmark, Costa Rica, Netherlands, Jamaica, New Zealand, Portugal, and Switzerland.

— Mark Channing Miller

–   –   –

* Not to be confused with a B-1 bomber, introduced HERE by an Air Force captain in the 37th Bomber Squadron at the Westfield International Air Show in 2001.

Weekender, 10-3-21

This will be a brief Weekender. It consists of a reading assignment. Please find and read or reread Seymour Hersh’s “The Killing of Osama bin Laden,” first published by The London Review of Books in May 2015 and then the following year in Hersh’s book of the same name published by Verso.

I’ve referred to it before, most recently in “Update, 9-8-21” (click HERE for it). But while rereading Hersh’s 10,000-word piece yesterday and today I realized anew how seemingly comprehensive and revealing a piece of reporting it is.

What got me to look at it again was the first of dozens of references Webster Griffin Tarpley makes to bin Laden in the fifth edition of his book 9/11 Synthetic Terrorism: Made in USA (2011). It comes at the end of this passage on page 14:

“The post-9/11 hysteria was successfully redirected by the neocons to motivate the infamous US attack on Iraq of March 2003. . . . With [President] Obama’s West Point speech of December 2009, the Afghanistan war has been officially expanded to include a war against the nuclear power Pakistan. This war has been further accentuated in the spring of 2011 by the much touted elimination of Osama bin Laden, who in reality has been dead for almost a decade.”

What?

It appears that people interested in truths behind the September 2001 terrorist attacks and the subsequent wars launched by the United
States might want to read the 2011 Tarpley book and compare what he says against what Hersh does four years later, and
how both of them say it.

— Mark Channing Miller

Television and War

The following piece is reprinted with the author’s permission from the Wayne Madsen Report, where it was posted on Sept. 7-8. — MCM

The Hypnotic Effects of TV News Intros

By Wayne Madsen*

For the last 30 or so years, it has not mattered whether you tune into the televised news in Kansas City or Khartoum or Denver or Dar es Salaam. A few seconds of viewing and hearing news introductions have had the same effect: you are mesmerized by techniques developed by psychiatrists, psychologists, and psychological warfare experts to keep your attention and lure you into the trance-like state. Once you are hypnotized, you will have the tendency to believe whatever is being transmitted to you by news readers who are merely following what they are seeing on teleprompters.

Using various forms of technology to control or subjugate populations was termed “biopower” by French philosopher and social theorist Michel Foucault. Modern television, including large- and small-screen displays relying on high-definition clarity, computer-generated graphics, and surround-sound audio has been manipulated by social control engineers, in conjunction with broadcasters, to achieve the maximum in phantasmatic media impact, which is a fancy phrase for “brainwashing.”

The use of captivating screens, mixed with photo and video montages, is designed to fixate the viewer, through illusory perception, as the deictic center of the temporal few seconds it takes to mesmerize the target.

Convincing the viewer that he or she is the deictic center is achieved by the use of slick graphics such as a spinning globe. Over 80 percent of all news intros rely on some form of a spinning globe. Known as “cartographic stimulation,” this technique helps to place the viewer in his or her own deictic center based on geo-tagging. Other techniques use a virtual maze, for example, within a familiar city, to mesmerize the target. The viewer, briefly disoriented, focuses in on where he or she is at the moment. Everything else on or off screen becomes a blur.

The spinning globe has the same effect on the viewer as the hypnotic wheel or “hypno spiral” [readers may find examples online]. The viewer gazes intently on the point of fixation, the center of the vortex. The center might be the East Coast of the United States, the greater Paris region, the Qatar peninsula, or the island of Sri Lanka. Foucault would call this technique a biopower tool for mass hypnosis.

Fox News was the first major network to rely on such psychological gimmickry in its coverage of Desert Storm, the first Gulf War. Some psychologists and graphics experts believe that such news intro mental manipulation, for example, by West Germany’s ARD and ZDF and Austria’s ORF networks, has been in effect since as early as 1955. After the September 11, 2001 attacks and the U.S. military interventions in Afghanistan and Iraq, as well as the “Global War on Terror,” the technological mesmerizing of television viewers was adopted by all major networks, including CNN and MS-NBC. Today, hypnotic effect intros are available at a nominal cost or as freeware to the most obscure Internet-based television programs, including those that constantly spout extreme far-right propaganda.

Few people understand that television news and what purport to be news programs in broadcast, cable, and web formats are using hypnotic intros to spread their messages.

When it comes to major catastrophic weather events arising from global climate change, the Covid pandemic becoming endemic, and the breakdown of democratic rule by fascist political movements, this combination of graphics, lights, video and auditory stimuli is intended to brainwash large sectors of the population. The fact that the viewing masses become complacent with regard to corporate polluters and environmentally-destructive corporations, who are teamed up with political fascists, cannot be understated.

Below [in the version of this article on the WMR website] are compilations of news intros from around the world. A note of caution is in order. Since all of these intros rely on the aforementioned methods, view them only if you are free of other tasks or do not suffer from flashing light-inducing seizures, including epilepsy. Most people will find themselves falling victim to the disorienting hypnotic effects of the following intro segments. That is, of course, the desired effect.

–   –   –

* Wayne Madsen is a Washington, D.C.-based investigative journalist, author and columnist. Among his books are The Star and the Sword (2014), in which he describes intimate involvement by both Israel and Saudi Arabia in the planning and carrying out of the September 2001 terror attacks on the United States.