People who are not structural engineers can wonder what in the world structural engineers are talking about when they question the official investigation of how a third World Trade Center skyscraper — the 47-story Building 7, which was not hit by any airplane — came down on the afternoon of Sept. 11, 2001. Roland Angle’s presentation outlined below should help demystify the matter.  Angle is a career structural who is CEO of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth. Click HERE to see his hour-long presentation challenging 16 key decisions he says led to predetermined results at odds with science. — MCM

–   –   –

Summary Analysis of Critical Decisions that Derailed World Trade Center Investigation

CONCLUSION: Each of 16 critical decisions led the investigation toward the predetermined conclusion that office fires caused World Trade Center Building 7 to collapse on Sept. 11, 2001. The consistent pattern of those decisions made by key individuals operating within a large number of personnel involved in the investigation leads unavoidably to the inference that the decisions were deliberately guided by a coherent strategy to accomplish exactly that predetermined result.

Decision 1. Not to fight fires in WTC7.

Decision 2. To destroy evidence.

Decision 3. To appoint the National Institute for Standards and Technology to conduct the investigation.

Decision 4. To fail to test for incendiaries.

Decision 5. To ignore the presence of molten metal in the debris.

Decision 6.  To ignore the effect of high-temperature steel damage.

Decision 7. To ignore evidence of explosions in WTC7.

Decision 8. To exaggerate the thermal load on structure.

Decision 9. To falsify the structural thermal effect.

Decision 10. To omit critical structural features.

Decision 11. To fabricate the cascade of floor failures.

Decision 12. To fabricate the buckling of Column 79.

Decision 13. To fabricate the collapse of the core columns.

Decision 14. To fabricate the collapse model of WTC 7.

Decision 15. To ignore the significance of free fall.

Decision 16. To refuse to respond to legitimate inquiry.