Gage and Meiswinkle

Two leaders of the 9/11 truth movement will be speaking at two venues in central New England this Sunday, June 9 — in Hartford and West Hartford, Connecticut.

At 8:30 a.m. Richard Gage of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth will speak at the XL Center in downtown Hartford on “Prosecuting 9/11: Scientific Evidence as the Foundation.”

At 7:30 p.m. Dave Meiswinkle of the Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry will join Gage at Auerbach Auditorium in the University of Hartford’s Hillyer Hall at 200 Bloomfield Ave., West Hartford, for a discussion titled “9/11 Justice: From Scientific Evidence to Legal Action.” Details HERE and HERE.

Most recently this blog focused on them and the Lawyers’ Committee’s Mick Harrison and Bob McIlvaine for their lawsuit filed on March 25 in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia against the FBI and the Department of Justice, and the news conference the four held afterward in front of the Newseum that got no “mainstream” media attention. More on that HERE and HERE.

The first of Gage’s two appearances is part of a three-day event in Hartford called the Red Pill Expo at the XL Center, located at 1 Civic Center Plaza.

‘9/11 Report’ Protest

On Dec. 16, 1773, a group called the Sons of Liberty set ablaze a shipment of the East India Company’s tea in Boston Harbor and threw chests of the tea into the harbor as part of growing resistance to what was seen as unfair taxation. A seminal event leading to the American Revolution, it was later known as the Boston Tea Party.*

On Dec. 16, 2006, others with a mission staged the Boston 9/11 Truth Tea Party** by throwing boxes representing cases of the 9/11 Commission Report*** into the same harbor in an effort to expose the many falsehoods of that report published two years earlier.

For a 10-minute video of the 2006 event, with statements by several participants, click HERE.

–   –   –

* From Wikipedia

** Boston 9/11 Truth coordinated it with allied groups and individuals from around the country.

*** From Wikipedia. Officially titled the Final Report of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States, the report has been disowned in various degrees by members of the Commission including its chairman and vice-chairman.

Narratives

Storytelling is part of life and this activity helps us make sense of the world, teaching us how to handle the hard days. Stories educate, inspire, and build relationships. — Glenice Robinson-Como

–   –   –

My friend Bruce, with whom I walked across Massachusetts in the spirit of 9/11 truth last spring, is a Unitarian. I’m an Episcopalian. He’s an engineer and a onetime college teacher of math and computer science. I’m a semi-retired journalist (the “semi” because of this blog).

Countless times during the walk from Provincetown to the New York State line, Bruce would tell strangers, “You can’t pulverize concrete,” much less iron and steel. Except, in the case of the World Trade Center’s Twin Towers and Building 7, “with pre-planted explosives and incendiaries of the kind sometimes described as military-grade.

David Ray Griffin knows this. He’s the author of Christian Faith and the Truth Behind 9/11 (2006) and eight or ten other books about the crime of the century. Bruce lent me his copy of the 2006 Griffin book the last time we got together and had brunch. Griffin’s books are never reviewed in the pages of such hopeless defenders of the executive branch’s 9/11 narratives as the New York Times and the rest of the mainstream media and most of the less-than-mainstream media.

Here’s where the Glenice Robinson-Como quote (up top) comes in. Stories do inspire and help people “through the hard days.” However, when concocted oh-so-carefully by a government bent on instilling fear to wreak havoc around the world, and buttressed by a fearful and compliant media, storytelling becomes part of repression and death.

One reason the truth of the mass murders of that clear September day nearly 18 years ago has taken so long to gain traction is that the executive branch of the U.S. government has divided and conquored — and big business including the military contractors, organized labor, organized religion, and just about everything else that can be organized, has gone along.

That is ending.

The mainstream media are putting themselves out of business with their lies and coverups.

“… No matter what problems we face, God in heaven will show up and show out,” writes Robinson-Como.

As it happens, she was writing, HERE, about a chapter of the Book of Daniel dealing with Daniel’s restoration of sanity to the realm of King Nebuchadnezzar. But her reflexion pertains as well thousands of years after someone wrote that story.

— Mark

Free Movie Saturday

For details of how to attend a free showing of “The Demolition of Truth: Psychologists Examine 9/11” at the Watertown Free Public Library on Saturday, May 25, at 2 p.m., click HERE.

It’s sponsored by Boston 9/11 Truth. The last event they sponsored there, several Saturdays ago, was a presentation by Boston homegrown truther James Perloff, about which more later.

Those wanting more information on the movie may type “the demolition of truth 9/11 film” into a search engine and check out a few of the offerings.

‘We Expect to Win It’

A victory may be in sight.

Near the end of the “9/11 Media Tool Kit” referred to in the entry of two days ago, litigation director Mick Harrison of the Lawyers’ Committee, says about the lawsuit* filed March 25 against the FBI and the Justice Department:

“[A]s a lawyer, I expect to win it. You might be surprised…. Not every 9/11 litigation that’s been tried in the past for citizens has had success. This one I expect to win — and for a very simple reason: All this evidence we’re talking about is either in the hands of the FBI (which is true, I think, for five of the six categories), and the other category that Richard [Gage] mentioned they’ve acknowledged the work of the Architects & Engineers and their plan to review it.

“[A]ll we have to prove to win this case is that the evidence is 9/11-related, that the FBI knew about it, that the original 9/11 Commission did not consider it, and that the new [9/11 Review] Commission did not assess it.

“And I can tell you — you can read our complaint,* black and white, on all four of those points, on all seven of the counts. We should win on each one of these.

“So this is not a symbolic action. We expect to win it. We expect it to result in a new assessment of evidence to be given to Congress and then by doing that we expect the American public to be better informed.”

–   –   –

* To read the full lawsuit, click HERE and again on the Download button.

9/11 Media Tool Kit

On March 25 a group of plaintiffs sued the FBI and the Justice Department in federal court to have those two agencies supply to Congress considerable important evidence they have illegally withheld regarding the murderous attacks of September 11, 2001. (Congress in 2014 mandated that the two institutions release the evidence to it along with independent assessments of it, but they have refused and have not been called out on this refusal by the nation’s news media.)

Today, the Washington, D.C.-based Justice Integrity Project carried a comprehensive “tool kit” for anyone with the time and inclination to delve into the lawsuit and the 9/11 mass-murder mystery the plaintiffs aim to solve. Find it HERE.

Don’t Fall for Fear

A five-by-seven-inch postcard came today from ACLU Massachusetts with “SPEAK UP” in bold red lettering against a tinted photograph of demonstrators. Two of their placards stood out:

“USING FEAR TO DIVIDE US = TERRORISM,” said one, and the other, “I STAND IN SOLIDARITY – – – – NO MUSLIM BAN. LET THEM IN.”

On the address side was this: “The ACLU of Massachusetts works — in the courts, legislature, and communities — to lead the resistance, promote equality, and defend democracy.”

It took about two seconds to realize that the Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry is doing just that for the nation, in two United States Districts — for Southern New York (which includes Manhattan) and for the District of Columbia, fighting for full investigations of the phony government narratives about the acts of mass-murder terror blamed on Muslim “extremists” on Sept. 11, 2001. The legislature for which the suit was filed in late March in D.C. is the Congress of the United States.

“Join us in the fight to protect liberty and justice for all,” is the appeal of ACLU Massachusetts.

The Lawyers’ Committee, as one can see HERE, HERE and HERE, is doing the same thing* in those two federal court districts for a nation the perpetrators set about to terrorize.

This sometimes-dormant blog should have more on this in a day or three. Please visit again and again and become active for truth, justice, and reconciliation. While there is zero information on these two legal actions in the mainstream media, there is a wealth of it on the web, for which there will be an updated list here soon.

— Mark

–   –   –

* In league with Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth. (It needs to be noted that at no level is the ACLU affiliated or working with either of these two organizations, whose focus is solely on real, full and transparent investigations of “9/11.”)

‘… No News Today’

Below please find an early 1950s song that says a lot about the news business. To listen, click on the title.

‘No There Ain’t No News Today’ *

When the chauffeur met his boss at the ship (at the ship) / as the father just returned from the trip (from the trip) / he said “What have you to say? Have you any news today?”

No there ain’t no news today (no news today).

No there ain’t no news today (doodowa, doodowa doowah). / Ain’t a thing that I can say (doodowa, doodowa doowah). / But we lost our home when the barn burned down / while we all were gone away (doodowa doowah).

No there ain’t no news today — / everything is quite okay. / But the maid had a fit, ’cause the butler quit. / Still there ain’t no news today.

Saxophone and piano take over for a bit.

And the cook left town one day (doodowa doodowa doowah) — / and he took your wife away (doodowa doodowa doowah). / And the cow** sat ’round when the house burned down. / Still there ain’t no news today (doodowa doodowa doowah).

No there ain’t … no news … to-day.

–   –   –

* Recorded by The Penguins in 1954

** Best guess at this word

What Lawsuit?

“I have become a reproach to all my enemies and even to my neighbors, a dismay to those of my acquaintance; when they see me in the street they avoid me.” — Psalm 31:11

“Well, I don’t know what kind of change it’s gonna make. It’s like evolution — changes don’t happen in a week, changes don’t happen in a year, changes don’t happen in ten years. But … this keeps on getting out, and I’ve heard from people around the world. So it’s all there. People have to find out…. You know, they go in their community, you know, and you get ostracized. … [Y]ou’ve got to put the work in. … It’s science, and that’s what convinced my wife, the science….” — Plaintiff Robert McIlvaine, when asked if he felt the legal action just brought in Federal District Court would make a change

–   –   –

UNS News Advisory:

FULL NEWS CONFERENCE TRANSCRIPT SAID COMING SOON

PITTSFIELD, Mass. (Unnamed News Service) April 14 — It was learned this week from a source in Washington, D.C., that a complete transcript of the news conference about a complaint filed on March 25 in U.S. District Court against the FBI and the Justice Department to release information withheld in violation of a Congressional mandate about the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, will appear on one or more websites by the end of April.

Making statements and answering questions at the news conference were Attorneys David Meiswinkle and Mick Harrison of the Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry, Richard Gage of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, and Robert McIlvaine, whose son was one of the first persons killed at the World Trade Center in lower Manhattan on Sept. 11, 2001.

Major newspapers and news services did not cover the legal filing or the news conference,* which was held on the sidewalk in front of the Newseum on Pennsylvania Avenue Northwest a couple of blocks from the United States District Court. Most of a reports by the Courthouse News Service was quickly withdrawn from its website.**

–   –   –

* Click HERE for a 46-minute video of the news conference, which does not contain extensive preliminary remarks.

** The 500-word report, HERE, was posted on the Courthouse News Service website on March 26. All but its first two paragraphs were deleted within a few hours.