Ho ho ho !

Want to know how the Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry and Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth have been doing in their joint effort to raise $50,000 by Dec. 31, 2018? Click HERE to find out, or to chip in.

The two groups have united in the drive for a Special Grand Jury investigation of as-yet-unprosecuted federal crimes in the destruction and mass murders of Sept. 11, 2001, at the World Trade Center.

Meanwhile, to find out why The New York Times or The Washington Post or The Associated Press aren’t on top of this (and a lot of other matters), click HERE for Caitlin Johnstone’s explanation and HERE for Christopher Hedges’*.

The short answer is, they’re not free to be.

And scroll down for info about the Lawyers’ Committee and the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York’s response to the Committee’s two petitions for a Special Grand Jury investigation.

Merry Christmas!

— Bruce and Mark

* Hedges mentions but does not link to Seymour Hersh’s report several years ago in The London Review of Books entitled “The Killing of Osama bin Laden.” Find it HERE.

Watch . . .

In the darkest days of December, hopeful news:

Breakthroughs coming to light in the last month are some of the most favorable since questioners started challenging impossible official stories about the murderous terror of September 11, 2001, in which nearly 3,000 people in the United States were killed in a single morning.

Please set aside an hour and a quarter to watch this INTERVIEW conducted a week ago. Jason Goodman of Crowdsource the Truth talks with RICHARD GAGE of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth and MICK HARRISON, DAVID MEISWINKLE and BARBARA HONEGGER of the Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry.

It’s a nice summary of what has happened since the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York said his office would comply with federal law in response to the Lawyers’ Committee’s two petitions to send voluminous evidence they have gathered to a Special Grand Jury to investigate yet-to-be-prosecuted federal crimes related to the destruction of three World Trade Center towers.

— Mark



Busy U.S. Attorney

It’s rare to see a news story related to investigating any of the mass murders of Sept. 11, 2001. Yet two greeted readers of The Berkshire Eagle* on its front page this morning, even if those massacres and their proper investigation were not mentioned.

The Washington Post and Associated Press stories, under the Eagle’s headlines “US attorney implicates Trump, campaign” and “Trump’s AG pick will face scrutiny,” may be found here and here as they appeared in other newspapers online.

Both relate to having a federal Special Grand Jury investigate the destruction of three World Trade Center skyscrapers more than 17 years ago.

The U.S. Attorney in the first story, Geoffrey S. Berman, in the Southern District of New York, is the same one who last month responded, tersely, to petitions on behalf of 12 families of individuals killed in the WTC building collapses, saying that his office would abide by federal law and referstacks of evidence about the collapses to a federal Special Grand Jury (even if he didn’t say it in so many words).

Please scroll down for an earlier mention in this blog of the U.S. Attorney’s response to the petitions filed by the Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry. The entry is titled “A Special Grand Jury to Get 9/11 Evidence.”

The second story is about President Trump’s nomination Friday of former U.S. Attorney General William Barr to “once again serve as America’s top law enforcement official.” It relates to a possible federal Special Grand Jury investigation because Barr, if approved for the post, would head the U.S. Department of Justice and be Berman’s boss.

— Mark

* Daily newspaper published in Pittsfield, Massachusetts, second-to-last town Bruce Henry and I walked through on our way from Provincetown on Cape Cod last spring wearing “9/11 Truth” signs to call attention to the need for a real investigation.